terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 INFLUENCE OF CHITOSAN, ABSCISIC ACID AND BENZOTHIADIAZOLE TREATMENTS ON SAVVATIANO (VITIS VINIFERA L.) WINES VOLATILE COMPOSITION PROFILE

INFLUENCE OF CHITOSAN, ABSCISIC ACID AND BENZOTHIADIAZOLE TREATMENTS ON SAVVATIANO (VITIS VINIFERA L.) WINES VOLATILE COMPOSITION PROFILE

Abstract

In the last decades the use of bioestimulants in viticulture have been promoted as alternative to conven- tional pesticides. Moreover, as bioestimulants promote the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in grape berries, several studies had investigated their influence on the accumulation of phenolic com- pounds (Monteiro et al., 2022). However, few studies, so far, are focused on the accumulation of the vo- latile compounds and their impact on the produced wines (Giménez-Bañón et al., 2022; Gomez- Plaza et al., 2012; Ruiz Garcia et al., 2014).
This study was conducted in a single vineyard of white autochthonous grapevine variety Savvatia- no (Vitis vinifera L.) in Muses Valley (Askri, Viotia, Greece). Chitosan (CHT), Abscisic Acid (ABA) and Benzothiadiazole (BTH) were applied. The applications were performed at veraison stage, in a rando- mized complete block and grapes were harvested at their optimum technological maturity level. White wines vinification procedures were carried out (Miliordos et al., 2022) physiochemical parameters of must and wine, and wine aroma compounds were examined. Volatile compounds were analyzed using a gas chromatography coupled to a mass spectrophotometric detector (Miliordos et al. 2022). Results were statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA at the p ≤ 0.05 level) and principal component analysis (PCA). CHT treatment increased total terpenes, esters and monoterpenes concentration which may enhance the desirable aromas for Savvatiano wines. Moreover, ABA enhanced the concentration of total esters, while kept in lower levels higher alcohols than control wines related to unpleasant aromas. On the other hand, BTH kept in low levels monoterpenes and acetates, as well as concentration of acids (hexanoic acid, isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric) and alcohols were still in low levels compared to control wines and the CHT and ABA treated. Furthermore, these differences in the volatile compound levels could sensorially detected, by the sensory panel.
The application of biostimulants recorded promising results to enhance aroma profile of the produced white wines. More research on different Greek cultivars in different terroirs is needed in order to en- hance our knowledge regarding the effect of biostimulants on grape and wine quality. Funding : This research was co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund of theEuropean Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program ompetitiveness,Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH–CREATE–INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK- 04200 (MU-SA).

 

1. Giménez-Bañón, María José, Juan Daniel Moreno-Olivares, Diego Fernando Paladines-Quezada, Juan Antonio Bleda-Sán-chez, José Ignacio Fernández-Fernández, Belén Parra-Torrejón, José Manuel Delgado-López, and Rocío Gil-Muñoz. 2022. “Effects of Methyl Jasmonate and Nano-Methyl Jasmonate Treatments on Monastrell Wine Volatile Composition.” Molecules 27 (9): 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092878
2. Gómez-Plaza, Encarna, Laura Mestre-Ortuño, Yolanda Ruiz-García, Jose Ignacio Fernández-Fernández, and Jose María Ló-pez-Roca. 2012. “Effect of Benzothiadiazole and Methyl Jasmonate on the Volatile Compound Composition of Vitis Vinife-ra L. Monastrell Grapes and Wines.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 63 (3): 394–401. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2012.12011
3. Miliordos, Dimitrios Evangelos, Alexandros Kanapitsas, Despina Lola, Elli Goulioti, Nikolaos Kontoudakis, Georgios Leventis, Myrto Tsiknia, and Yorgos Kotseridis. 2022. “Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Savvatiano (Vitis Vinifera L.) Grape and Wine Composition.” Beverages 8 (2): 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8020029.
4. Monteiro, Eliana, Berta Gonçalves, Isabel Cortez, and Isaura Castro. 2022. “The Role of Biostimulants as Alleviators of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Grapevine: A Review.” Plants 11 (3): 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030396.
5. Ruiz-Garcia, Y., J. M. Lopez-Roca, A. B. Bautista-Ortin, R. Gil-Munoz, and E. Gomez-Plaza. 2014. “Effect of Combined Use of Benzothiadiazole and Methyl Jasmonate on Volatile Compounds of Monastrell Wine.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 65 (2): 238–43. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2014.13119 

DOI:

Publication date: 09/02/2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Miliordos Dimitrios Evangelos¹, Elli Gouliti¹, Kontoudakis Nikolaos1,2, Kotseridis Yorgos¹

1. Agricultural University of Athens, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Laboratory of Oenology and Alcoholic Beverage Drinks, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece
2. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Oenology, International Hellenic University, 1st km Drama-Mikrochori, 66100 Drama, Greece

Contact the author*

Keywords

Savvatiano, Biostimulants, Volatile compounds, Aroma

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

TOWARDS THE SHELF-LIFE PREDICTION OF OLD CHAMPAGNE VINTAGES DEPENDING ON THE BOTTLE CAPACITY

Today, nearly one billion bottles of different sizes and capacities are aging in Champagne cellars while waiting to be put on the market. Among them, several tens of thousands of prestigious cuvees elaborated prior the 2000s are potentially concerned by prolonged aging on lees. However, when it comes to champagne tasting, dissolved CO₂ is a key compound responsible for the very much sought-after effer-vescence in glasses [1]. Yet, the slow decrease of dissolved CO₂ during prolonged aging of the most prestigious cuvees raises the issue of how long a champagne can age before it becomes unable to form CO₂ bubbles during tasting [2].

AROMA ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL SFORZATO DI VALTELLINA WINES BYINSTRUMENTAL AND SENSORY METHODOLOGIES

Sforzato di Valtellina DOCG is a special dry red wine produced from partially dehydrated Nebbiolo wine-grapes growing in the Rhaetian Alps valley of Valtellina (Lombardy, Italy). Valtellina terraced vineyards are located at an altitude of 350–800 m according to ‘heroic’ viticulture on steep slopes. The harvested grape bunches are naturally dehydrated indoors, where a slow and continuous withering occurs (about 20% w/w of weight loss), until at least 1st December when the grapes reach the desired sugar content and can be processed following a normal winemaking with maceration.

INFLUENCE OF THE THICKNESS OF OAK ALTERNATIVES ON THE COMPOSITION AND QUALITY OF RED WINES

Aging red wines in oak barrels is an expensive and laborious process that can only be applied to wines with a certain added value. For this reason, the use of oak alternatives coupled with micro-oxygenation has progressively increased over recent years, because it can reproduce the processes taking place in the barrels more economically and quickly [1]. Several studies have explored how oak alternatives [2-5] can contribute to wine composition and quality but little is known about the influence of their thickness.

HOW DOES ULTRASOUND TREATMENT AFFECT THE AGEING PROFILE OF AN ITALIAN RED WINE?

Many wine styles require moderate or extended ageing to ensure optimal consumer experience. However, few consumers have the interest or ability to age wine themselves, and holding wine in optimal conditions for extended periods is expensive for producers. A study was conducted on the use of ul-trasound energy on wine, with particular reference to its impact on sensory and chemical profiles. The OIV has authorised the use of ultrasound for processing crushed grapes (must) in Resolution OENO 616-2019, but not yet for finished wine1,2.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).